Here are some of the features that I noticed that were similar to the official cut uniform:
- Inverted buttons on sleeve cuff. This helps prevent snagging.
- Rounded collar tips.
- Slanted chest pockets with Velcro closure. This is good for use with tactical vests.
- Sleeve pockets with button closure. Also designed with vest use in mind. With a vest you can't access the front pockets of traditional BDUs so the bottom pockets were removed and replaced with sleeve pockets.
- Pockets in sleeves and pant legs for knee pads. Knee/elbow pads such as the Skydex knee pads (reviewed here) can be placed in these pockets.
- No lower pockets on top.
- Permanent creases.
- Elastic in the waist.
- Elastic top on leg pockets.
Here are the rest of the features of the pants:
Both of these items are made of 65% polyester/35% cotton twill using an extra fast dying process. They seem to fade after a few washes though. They get a worn look to them fairly quickly and compared to official Marine Corps utilities they fade extremely fast. You can see the differences of wear in the picture above showing Marine Corps Issue far right with Tru-Spec brand far left. In between is a version by Propper (which are brand new in the picture, not yet washed). The Tru-Spec are about a year old, the MCCUU is a few years old. You can also tell that the Tru-Spec camouflage itself is darker and not as crisp as the MCCUU.
Aside from fading, durability seems to be pretty good. The material hasn't broken down and stitching is still intact. The features are good and my brother hasn't really had any complaints about them yet.
Price on US Cav web page:
Pants: $30.99
Top: $30.99
Tyler's Blog
2 comments:
i have a set of propper's thats about 4 years old, theyre barely faded, and have lasted well they're color is i bit darker but over all the color dosent fade like tru-spec( i also have some of them they look just like yours in the pic)
Yes, the propper ones seem to be better on fading (or lack thereof).
Post a Comment